Cynodontium eocenicum, a new moss from the Baltic Amber
Asyat S. Abakarova, Pavel I. Alekseev, Jan Kučera

Literature Cited
Aleksandrova, G. N. & N. I. Zaporozhets. 2008. a. Palynological characteristics of Upper Cretaceous and Paleogene deposits on the west of the Sambian Peninsula (Kaliningrad region), Part 1. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 16: 295 316. Google Scholar, Crossref
Aleksandrova, G. N. & N. I. Zaporozhets. 2008. b. Palynological characteristics of Upper Cretaceous and Paleogene deposits on the west of the Sambian Peninsula (Kaliningrad region), Part 2. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 16: 528 539. Google Scholar, Crossref
Alekseev, V.I. 2013. The beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) of Baltic amber: the checklist of described species and preliminary analysis of biodiversity. Zoology and Ecology 23(1): 5–12.Google Scholar
Alekseev, V.I. & P.I. Alekseev. 2016. New approaches for reconstruction of the ecosystem of an Eocene Amber Forest. Biology Bulletin 43: 75–86.Google Scholar, Crossref
Caspary, R. & R. Klebs. 1907. Atlas von dreissig Tafeln zu der Abhandlung: Die Flora des Bernsteins und anderer fossiler Harze des ostpreussischen Tertiдrs. Abhandlungen der Kцniglich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Berlin.Google Scholar
Engel, M.S. 2001. A monograph of the Baltic amber bees and evolution of the Apoidea (Hymenoptera). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 259: 1–192.Google Scholar
Frahm, J.-P. 2004. A new contribution to the moss flora of Baltic and Saxon amber. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 129: 81 101.Google Scholar, Crossref
FRAHM J.-P. 2005. The genus Hypnodontopsis (Bryopsida, Rhachitheciaceae) in Baltic and Saxon amber. Bryologist 108: 228–235.Google Scholar, Crossref
Frahm, J.-P. 2010. Die Laubmoosflora des Baltischen Bernsteinwaldes. Jena, Weissdorn Verlag, 101 pp.Google Scholar, www
Gangulee, H.C. 1971. Mosses of Eastern India and adjacent regions. Part 2. Privately published, Calcutta: 177–566.Google Scholar
Gцppert, H.R. 1853. Ьber die Bernsteinflora. Monatsberichte der Kцniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaft zu Berlin [1853]: 450–477.Google Scholar
GЦPPERT H.R. & G.C. BERENDT. 1845. Der Bernstein und die in ihm befindlichen Pflanzenreste der Vorwelt. Commission der Nicolaischen Buchhandlung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Higuchi, M. 2011. Endemic species of bryophytes in Japan. Bulletin of the National Science Museum. Series B, Botany 37(3): 117–126.Google Scholar
Ignatov, M.S. & E.E. Perkovsky. 2011. Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine). Arctoa 20: 1–18.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov, M.S. & E.E. Perkovsky. 2013. Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine), 2. Arctoa 22: 83–92.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov, M.S. & E.E. Perkovsky. 2016. Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine). 3. Pottiodicranum, a new moss genus from the Late Eocene. Arctoa 25: 229–235.Google Scholar, Crossref
Konopka, A. S., P. S. Herendeen & P. R. Crane. 1998. Sporophytes and gametophytes of Dicranaceae from the Santonian (Late Cretaceous) of Georgia, USA. American Journal of Botany 85: 714 723.Google Scholar, Crossref
Kozub,D., V. Khmelik, Yu. Shapoval, V. CHentsov, S. Yatsenko, B. Litovchenko & V. Starykh. 2008. . Helicon Focus Software. http://www.heliconsoft.comGoogle Scholar
SHARP, A. J. , H. CRUM, & P. M. ECKEL. 1994. The moss flora of Mexico, Part 1-2,. Memories of The New York Botanical Garden, 69, New York. 1113 p. Google Scholar, Crossref
SCHIMPER, W.P. 1869. Traitй de palйontologie vйgйtale. Vol. 1. J. B. Bailliиre et Fils, Paris.Google Scholar
Wolfe, A.P., R.C. McKellar, R. Tappert, R.N.S. Sodhi & K. Muehlenbachs. 2016. Bitterfeld amber is not Baltic amber: Three geochemical tests and further constraints on the botanical affinities of succinite. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 225: 21–32.Google Scholar, Crossref